Lord Keeper of Kobol wrote:Regarding DKDev_Chris' post viewtopic.php?f=6&t=8338&start=90#p62034 (quoted above)
Does this post not address why the change occurred or does not address it in sufficient detail?
Does this post not explain why it was necessary or does it not explain the necessity in sufficient detail?
Does this post not give a good reason or does it not give the good reason in sufficient detail or is the reason given not a good one?
Does this post not *actually* explain things or does it not do this in sufficient detail?
No it doesn't mate.
It doesn't explain why dreadstones were necessary for new content. It doesn't explain why once the lower payouts are in place, new contents could be made available with the original gems.
And don't give me the BS about dreadstones are only for end game users. I am on two of four leaderboards, have everything maxed out except for walls (and even these are all level 8s and 9s), and I've put in 1500 stars+ every tournament since dreadstones were introduced and still can't afford a single UR mine.